Predictors of Self-Reported Hearing Problems Among Commercial Transport Workers Using Personal Listening Devices in Kano State, Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background
Noise-induced hearing loss is one of the most common preventable occupational health problems worldwide. Commercial transport workers are routinely exposed to environmental and traffic noise and may experience additional auditory exposure through the use of personal listening devices. This study determined the prevalence of self-reported hearing problems and identified factors associated with hearing-related symptoms among commercial transport workers in Kano State, Nigeria.
Methods
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 410 commercial transport workers selected using a multistage sampling technique. Data were collected using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. Self-reported hearing problems were assessed based on the presence of hearing-related symptoms, including tinnitus, hearing difficulty, ear discomfort, and reduced hearing sensitivity. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26. Associations were assessed using Pearson’s chi-square test, while multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of hearing problems. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
Self-reported hearing-related symptoms were common among respondents. Frequent need to increase listening volume was reported by 27.8%, ear discomfort by 25.9%, tinnitus by 23.9%, and difficulty hearing passengers or traffic sounds by 19.0%. Only 9.3% had ever undergone a formal hearing assessment. After adjustment for potential confounders, respondents aged above 30 years were more likely to report hearing problems (aOR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.14–2.91, p = 0.012). Similarly, more than five years of occupational experience (aOR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.43–3.92, p = 0.001), daily earphone use exceeding one hour (aOR = 2.69, 95% CI: 1.52–4.77, p < 0.001), listening at high volume (aOR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.82–5.43, p < 0.001), earphone use while driving (aOR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.41–4.31, p = 0.002), poor knowledge of hearing risks (aOR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.12–3.27, p = 0.017), and failure to take listening breaks (aOR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.01–2.93, p = 0.043) were independent predictors of hearing problems.
Conclusion
Hearing-related symptoms were common among commercial transport workers in Kano State and were significantly associated with both occupational and behavioural factors. Prolonged earphone use, high listening volume, earphone use while driving, poor hearing-risk awareness, and inadequate listening practices were important predictors of hearing problems. Occupational hearing conservation programmes, hearing-health education, and routine hearing screening should be prioritised among transport workers.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
REFERENCES
1. Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 2014;383(9925):1325–32.
2. Neitzel RL, Fligor BJ. Risk of noise-induced hearing loss due to recreational sound: review and recommendations. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019;146(5):3911–21.
3. Daniel E. Noise and hearing loss: a review. J Sch Health. 2007;77(5):225–31.
4. World Health Organization. World report on hearing. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
5. Le Prell CG, Dell S, Hensley B, Hall JW III, Campbell KC, Antonelli PJ, et al. Digital music exposure reliably induces temporary threshold shift in normal-hearing human subjects. Ear Hear. 2012;33(6):e44–58.
6. Keppler H, Dhooge I, Vinck B. Hearing in young adults. Part II: the effects of recreational noise exposure. Noise Health. 2015;17(78):245–52.
7. Vogel I, Verschuure H, Van der Ploeg CPB, Brug J, Raat H. Adolescents and MP3 players: too many risks, too few precautions. Pediatrics. 2009;123(6):e953–8.
8. Portnuff CDF, Fligor BJ, Arehart KH. Teenage use of portable listening devices: a hazard to hearing? J Am Acad Audiol. 2011;22(10):663–77.
9. Serra MR, Biassoni EC, Richter U, Minoldo G, Franco G, Abraham S, et al. Recreational noise exposure and its effects on the hearing of adolescents. Int J Audiol. 2005;44(2):65–73.
10. Smith PA, Davis A, Ferguson M, Lutman ME. The prevalence and type of social noise exposure in young adults in England. Noise Health. 2000;2(6):41–56.
11. World Health Organization. Make listening safe: a WHO initiative for safe listening. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
12. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies. Health Promot Int. 2000;15(3):259–67.
13. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(2):97–107.
14. Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1977.
15. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.
16. Levin KA. Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evid Based Dent. 2006;7(1):24–5.
17. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
18. Midi H, Sarkar SK, Rana S. Collinearity diagnostics of binary logistic regression model. J Interdiscip Math. 2010;13(3):253–67.
19. World Health Organization. Deafness and hearing loss. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.
20. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4.
21. Widén SE, Erlandsson SI. Self-reported tinnitus and noise sensitivity among adolescents in Sweden. Noise Health. 2004;7(25):29–40.
22. Carter NL, Williams J, Black DA, Bundred PE. The extent and effects of child exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. J Public Health Med. 2001;23(1):23–9